News
JAM | Oct 23, 2025

PNP calls on the JLP to clarify reports of US$201,500 payment from CEMEX    

/ Our Today

administrator
Reading Time: 3 minutes
FILE PHOTO: Prime Minister Dr Andrew Holness (right), and Managing Director of Carib Cement Company Limited Jorge Martinez Mora, walk along a new concrete road at Bay Farm Villa Close in St Andrew West Central on Thursday, November 21, 2024. The project was undertaken in collaboration with Carib Cement and parent company, Cemex. (Photo: JIS/Yhomo Hutchinson)

The People’s National Party (PNP) is calling on the Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) to urgently clarify reports surrounding a payment to the Andrew Holness-led party of US$201,538 by the Mexican-based company CEMEX, parent of Caribbean Cement Company Limited (CCC), which was disclosed in CEMEX’s filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

According to an article published in The Jamaica Gleaner on Sunday, October 19, 2025, this payment was described as “fees” paid to the JLP. CEMEX subsequently issued an amended filing to the SEC, which removed any mention of this payment.

Dr Dayton Campbell, General Secretary of the PNP, said the disclosure of fees being paid to the ruling JLP, the party in government, raises serious concerns, especially given the magnitude of the payment.

People’s National Party General Secretary Dayton Campbell speaking at a press conference on Thursday, September 11, 2025.

“Let us be clear, CEMEX and its subsidiary CCC have been good corporate citizens and have contributed meaningfully to Jamaica’s development, demonstrating strong corporate social responsibility over the years. Like many other companies, they have made political donations to both major parties, and the PNP has no issue with legitimate political contributions made in accordance with the law,” said Dr Campbell.

“However, the report of a payment categorised as ‘fees’ to the JLP implies a payment of compensation to a political party for services rendered. This begs the question, exactly what services were provided by the JLP, the party in government, in consideration for this payment? What was this US$201,538 a quid pro quo for?

Dr Campbell emphasised that this calls into question the propriety of the ruling party’s financial arrangements. The charging of fees by the party in government is outside the legislative framework of campaign financing, and demands a full and transparent explanation from the Jamaica Labour Party as to the basis of this payment.”

The current image has no alternative text. The file name is: 2024-04-25T112342Z_1_LYNXNPEK3O0J3_RTROPTP_4_CEMEX-RESULTS-scaled.jpg

“The JLP must clear the air on this matter before speculation grows. Jamaica cannot afford to leave investors with the impression that the governing party is using its position to extract payments from companies for political services for which it charges fees. Such perceptions will damage investor confidence and risk further reducing foreign direct investment, which has already fallen precipitously over the period since the JLP has been in office,” he said.

Dr Campbell added that the lack of transparency around this fee payment is eroding public trust and undermining Jamaica’s international reputation.

“The JLP, which is the party in government, must come clean to the Jamaican people and the investor community about this fee, without further delay. Continued silence will only deepen the perception that corruption has become the price of doing business in Jamaica,” he concluded.

The People’s National Party remains steadfast in its call for good governance, transparency, and accountability from all political actors.

Comments

What To Read Next