ChatGPT Image Jul 26, 2026, 10_48_38 AM
Have Your Say
JAM | Jul 26, 2026

Dennis Minott | Too much month when the money’s done

/ Our Today

administrator
Reading Time: 6 minutes
ChatGPT Image Jul 26, 2026, 10_42_35 AM

There is a peculiar kind of anxiety that arrives when the money finishes but the calendar does not. It is not the dramatic poverty of empty cupboards photographed for charitable appeals.

 It is quieter, more private and often carefully concealed. The bills have been paid—or as many as could be paid. A little food remains. The telephone still works. Yet there are ten, twelve or perhaps fifteen days left before another salary, pension or remittance arrives.

In Jamaica, we understand the condition instinctively: too much month when the money done.

It is not necessarily caused by recklessness. The people experiencing it are often disciplined workers who rise early, travel far, perform necessary jobs and return home exhausted. They have calculated the supermarket bill, postponed the dentist, reduced the electricity usage, stretched the cooking gas and told the children that the requested school item will have to wait.

dennis-minott-jamaica-our-today-demo
Dr Dennis A Minott. (Photo: Contributed)

Still, the money finishes first.

The trouble is not merely that things cost too much. It is that too many Jamaicans are paid too little to participate securely in the society their labour sustains.

We speak endlessly about employment figures, economic growth, investor confidence and fiscal discipline. These indicators matter. But a country can report favourable economic statistics while its people remain trapped in unfavourable household arithmetic. Employment alone does not guarantee dignity when the wage attached to the job cannot reliably cover food, shelter, transportation, utilities, healthcare and education.

A person may be officially employed and privately drowning.

I have lived long enough to remember when an ordinary salary, carefully managed, could carry greater social meaning. It could support a household, educate children, maintain modest savings and perhaps allow a family to improve its circumstances over time. People were not wealthy, but work seemed to contain a credible promise: that responsibility, sacrifice and patience might eventually produce security.

ChatGPT Image Jul 26, 2026, 10_48_38 AM

For many Jamaicans, that promise has weakened.

The modern worker is told to become more productive, flexible, innovative and entrepreneurial. Yet the same worker faces rising food prices, costly transportation, unforgiving utility bills, expensive housing and wages that frequently move with the speed of a reluctant donkey. Every increase in income seems already claimed by some increase in expenditure.

The salary arrives not as money belonging to the worker, but as a temporary visitor passing through the worker’s bank account on its way to the supermarket, landlord, transport operator, school, pharmacy, electricity company and lender.

What remains is expected to perform miracles.

We should therefore be careful when lecturing struggling households about financial literacy. Certainly, budgeting matters. Saving matters. Avoiding unnecessary debt matters. But no spreadsheet can make an inadequate wage adequate. One cannot budget one’s way out of a structural shortage of income.

ChatGPT Image Jul 26, 2026, 10_56_13 AM (1)

Financial literacy teaches people how to divide the cake. It does not enlarge the cake.

This distinction is important because societies often moralise inequality. The wealthy are assumed to possess superior discipline, while the poor are presumed to have made inferior choices. Yet many fortunes are supported by inherited property, access to capital, influential networks, tax advantages and opportunities unavailable to the ordinary worker.

Meanwhile, the woman cleaning an office may leave behind spotless floors in a building whose monthly rental income exceeds everything she will earn in decades. The security guard protects assets worth hundreds of millions of dollars but may struggle to secure his own family’s next meal. The teacher develops the minds from which future prosperity will emerge, yet may require a loan to repair a refrigerator.

This is not an argument against wealth. It is an argument against an economic arrangement in which the people who create, maintain and protect wealth are increasingly unable to live decently from their work.

Inequality is not only a difference in bank balances. It is a difference in breathing room.

One household can absorb a medical emergency without panic. Another must choose between medication and electricity. One student receives a laptop immediately. Another tries to complete assignments on a cracked telephone screen. One family purchases groceries in bulk and saves money. Another buys smaller quantities each day and ultimately pays more because poverty itself carries a surcharge.

Even time becomes unequal. The better-off can pay for convenience, private transportation, household assistance and faster services. The poor spend hours travelling, queueing, waiting and negotiating. They lose not only money but portions of life.

When the money finishes early, people do not simply stop spending. They improvise. They borrow from relatives. They use one credit facility to satisfy another. They postpone medication. They dilute meals. They avoid answering certain calls. They send apologetic messages. They become skilled at inventing explanations that preserve a little dignity.

ChatGPT Image Jul 26, 2026, 10_58_10 AM

Children notice more than adults imagine. They learn not to ask. They recognise the particular silence that follows the arrival of a bill. They understand when “next week” really means “I do not know how”.

The psychological burden is enormous. A person can be industrious, educated and responsible yet feel like a failure every month because the national wage structure has transferred the consequences of inequality into the private conscience.

This is one of the cruellest features of economic injustice: it makes structural problems feel like personal shortcomings.

ChatGPT Image Jul 26, 2026, 10_59_52 AM

What, then, should be done?

Jamaica must begin treating wages not merely as a cost to employers but as the principal means by which citizens participate in the economy. Workers are not only units of production. They are customers, parents, tenants, taxpayers, caregivers and community members. When wages remain chronically weak, domestic demand weakens, household debt grows and social frustration deepens.

Productivity and pay must be discussed together. Training must lead to genuine advancement, not simply additional certificates attached to the same inadequate income. Public policy should support affordable transportation, energy, housing, childcare, healthcare and education because these essential costs determine the real value of every wage.

We must also examine who captures the gains from national development. When roads, resorts, financial projects, digital systems or energy investments are announced, citizens should ask not only how much money is being invested but how much lasting value will reach Jamaican workers.

How many decent jobs will be created? What wages will be paid? What skills will be transferred? How much ownership will remain in Jamaica? Will ordinary families become more secure, or will they merely service another profitable enterprise owned elsewhere?

Economic growth that enriches balance sheets while impoverishing the people doing the balancing is not development worthy of celebration.

I do not expect every Jamaican to become wealthy. Nor do I imagine that government can erase every hardship. But it is neither radical nor unreasonable to expect that a person who works faithfully should be able to eat properly, maintain a home, obtain healthcare, educate children, save something and face the final week of the month without terror.

A decent society does not ask its workers to perform monthly acts of financial resurrection.

The phrase “too much month when the money done” may make us smile because Jamaican humour has always helped us survive what should have broken us. But beneath the wit lies an indictment. Too many people are working, sacrificing and budgeting with exceptional care, only to remain one emergency away from collapse.

The problem is not that the month is too long.

The problem is that the rewards of our economy are distributed too narrowly, while its burdens are distributed with remarkable efficiency.

Until honest work provides a credible route to security, the money will continue to finish early—and the month will continue to feel mercilessly long.

Comments

What To Read Next