Entertainment
USA | Jun 5, 2022

Mariah Carey ‘exploited’ me, declares Vince Vance in US$20m ‘All I Want for Christmas…’ lawsuit

/ Our Today

administrator
Reading Time: 2 minutes
Mariah Carey’s 1994 classic, ‘All I Want for Christmas Is You’.

(Reuters)

Mariah Carey was sued on Friday (June 3) over her 1994 Christmas classic All I Want for Christmas Is You by a songwriter who said he co-wrote a song with the same title five years earlier.

In a complaint filed in New Orleans federal court, Andy Stone is seeking at least US$20 million in damages from Carey, her co-writer and Sony Music Entertainment for copyright infringement and misappropriation, among other claims.

Stone, who performs as Vince Vance with the country-pop band Vince Vance & the Valiants, accused the defendants of having illegally exploited his “popularity and unique style” and caused confusion by recording the newer song without his permission.

Singer Mariah Carey. (File Photo: REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni)

Carey’s and Stone’s songs have different lyrics and melodies.

Spokespeople for Carey and Sony Music did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Carey’s song appeared on her album Merry Christmas, and has long received widespread play on radio and in retail shopping environments during the holiday season.

Andy Stone, who goes by the name Vince Vance on stage. (Photo: Facebook @Vince Vance)

It has also topped the Billboard Hot 100 chart every year since 2019, despite having been recorded a quarter century earlier. All I Want for Christmas Is You was Carey’s 19th No. 1 song, one fewer than the Beatles.

Stone said his own song had received “extensive airplay” during the 1993 Christmas season, and also appeared on Billboard charts.

The Andy Stone penned ‘All I Want for Christmas Is You’.

It wasn’t clear from the complaint when Stone first learned about Carey’s song.

The complaint said Stone’s lawyers first contacted the defendants in April 2021 about their alleged unauthorised use, but were “unable to come to any agreement.”

Stone’s lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for additional comment.

The case is Stone v Carey et al, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana, No. 22-01616.

Comments

What To Read Next